Hi. I'm Morten Just, and this is my blog. I write about user experience and how software could behave a bit more like the rest of us.

Finding out which things to throw out

August 30th, 2010

I’m moving to another country. While cleaning out I was surprised to find out how many things I own that I don’t need.

It reminded me of Bruce Sterling’s keynote on Reboot last year, so I listened to it again. As I listened to it in my new context I was impressed by how much sense it makes. So I decided to make it into a flow chart, one made of conveyor belts and cardboard boxes.

Click to zoom.

Of course Sterling isn’t the only one who’s had things to say about not having things. It feels like the whole world is moving its stuff out of the physical world and into the cloud.

The world’s first clock radio

August 29th, 2010

As early as 1600, the King of Denmark had a early home music system installed in his castle. A 3-pipe system, moved the sound of musicians playing in the basement and into his “winter room”. The system was a forerunner of the “piped music” we hear today in public spaces like shopping malls, and the large sound systems in our private cars and homes.

Audible Dwelling

I misunderstood Ole’s story and thought the King used the orchestra as a clock radio.

Introducing Donefeed, a master reading list

August 19th, 2010

When someone posts links I want to check out on Twitter I mark them as favorite. in Google Reader I use the star button. For videos I use Delicious with the tag “towatch”. Instapaper gets my long articles. A lot of this happens on my mobile, in apps.

That’s a lot of lists.

What I need is a reading list aggregator. I asked Twitter. Shortly after, Ian told me he had built it! We set up a repository (on Dropbox, of course) and a shared App Engine Python app and began refining.

Donefeed uses your Google Account to log you in, so no boring sign up necessary (and no time wasted on coding one).

Add any feed to your account. Here’s mine.

… and their items show up as your reading list.

Check it out on donefeed.com

Imagine you were an astronaut, just having found out that you have to manage your space station budget

August 3rd, 2010

Morten Just:
Explain capex and obex to me. Begin your two-sentence answer with “Imagine you were an astronaut, just having found out that…”

(Someone just responded… From Austin C./M/Liverpool,UK, Re: **finance**)
Imagine you were an astronaut, just having found out that you have to manage your space station budget! Operational Expenditure (OpEx) is what you have to spend on an ongoing basis just to keep the place running as it is (Fuel, Food, etc). Capital Expenditure (CapEx) is money you can spend to make it a nicer place to live or add a cool laser for blasting asteroids or something.
(To reply, type ‘Austin:’ followed by a message, or just type ‘thanks!’. Type ‘more’ for options.)

Thanks, Austin and Aardvark.

How we built a take-away menu image search engine in just 50 lines of code

June 24th, 2010

I often want to Google my flat. Especially when I’m ordering take-away and can’t find the menu.

This would be handy:

We almost built that.

Read the rest of this entry »

A highlighter pen for the web

June 7th, 2010

For a while Claus and I have been talking about how disjointed the reading experience is from the online experience. Sometimes reading on the web is like reading behind those glass walls researchers use when examining dangerous material.

Reading online vs. offline

Interaction is learning
I recently heard Dr. Jan Borchers say something like “you should be able to tell if a book is yours from a distance of 20 meters”. The point is kind of obvious; the more you interact with a text, the faster and better you absorb its contents.

So we built Marksaved so you can interact with and annotate websites you read. Highlights today, notes in the near future.

The annotation swarm
And then there’s the flood of cool stuff you can do with thousands of highlights and notes on webpages. Ultra-compact summaries of long articles is one. Spotting trends is another. Using highlights as search ranking is a third.

Here’s a longer version of the video on the site. We decided it may become too boring and long for the front page, so I’m posting it here instead:

Check it out for yourself at Marksaved.com

How I made an animation using a whiteboard and iMovie in 10 minutes

May 12th, 2010

When I’m in a meeting room I typically sketch people on the whiteboard. Today I made an animation.

It turned out to be quite a quick process, so I thought I’d share how I did. The fact that I spent less than 10 minutes on this one could be promising for quick visual explanations using animation.

Read the rest of this entry »

I wrote a guest post on the Google Docs blog

May 10th, 2010

The nice people on the Google Docs team asked me to write a guest post on their blog explaining how to use my wireframe kit. Read the full post on the official Google Docs blog.

We also had a good chat about how Google Drawings can be improved for wireframing, so maybe we’ll see an even better cloud-based wireframing option in the future.

iPhone wireframe stencils for Google Docs – add text and you’re done

May 2nd, 2010

Thanks so much for all the positive feedback on the Wireframing in Google Docs post. I’m sorry if I haven’t yet responded to your reply, you’re always welcome to ping me on @mortenjust.

One of the questions I got was if I had a set of iPhone stencils coming up. I do.

Like in the ones for the web, there is an empty one, and one with a template. This one is a typical iPhone drill-down pattern; groups > items > item.

In other words, to make your first iPhone wireframe, all you need to do is to add text.

I’ve added both templates to the shared folder. Have fun.

A wireframe kit for Google Drawings and 5 reasons it beats Omnigraffle and Visio

April 19th, 2010


I’ve been playing around with the newest addition to Google Docs, Google Drawings, and I’m quite liking it. I tried drawing a few diagrams and even a wireframe, and it turns out the basic drawing interactions are just as good – in some cases even better – than what I’m used to in Omnigraffle and Fireworks.

5 reasons Google Drawings beats Viso and Omnigraffle

We know the cloud computing arguments, and they certainly apply to wireframes

  1. It’s live. The entire team can work on the same document and see each other’s work instantly
  2. The wireframes live in the cloud, no sending files around, no outdated documents
  3. The risk of losing data is zero. It saves for every edit you make
  4. It’s free
  5. Most people already have a Google account, so no sign up required

We need stencils

One thing was missing though: Stencils. Omnigraffle has stencils coming out of its ears, and Fireworks has some excellent built-in ones. But Google Drawings in its current early and simple form simply doesn’t have it. So I made one.

Leaving the stencils in the gutter

An interesting limitation is the fact that

  • there’s no stencil library function and
  • you can’t easily copy and paste from one document to another.

One solution, it seems, is to clone one of the wireframe kits and thereby also cloning the stencils into each document. To not print or export the stencils, I’ve left them in the gutter area of the document. Seems to work quite okay.

Kind of blue

I’ve been wanting a blue kit since I left a project years ago where we used blue stencils (the idea was Peter‘s). As you may have experienced, some customers simply don’t understand wireframes. The blue color gives that well-known blueprint feel, and shouldn’t prompt questions like “I like it, doesn’t it need a splash of colour?”

The templates

To make it even easier for you (ehm, me) I’ve begun making simple starting point templates.

Main blank template

Product detail page

Landing page

Item list view

They’re all in this shared folder on Google Docs, and it will be updated when there are new templates. If you make one, let me know and I’ll add it to the folder so everyone can use it.

UPDATE: I just added a few wireframe stencils for iPhone

UPDATE: The stencils are now in the Google Docs template gallery:

Why designers should be on a button budget

March 25th, 2010

I sometimes wish I could put myself, the designers and our stakeholders on a button budget. Just like we’re already on a time and a salary budget, we should introduce scarcity on another limited resource – brain cycles in the heads of our users.

Introducing a scarcity would make … (continued)

Read the rest of this entry »

Side-by-side UI: How lethal is Vodafone’s iPhone killer? You decide

March 20th, 2010

As I mentioned in the iPhone vs. Windows Phone post, I’ve been curious finding out how the Vodafone 360 phone would stack up, side by side. I finally found out how to do screenshots, so here it is.

Since I work on the 360 project, I’m not going to be the judge. Instead, I’ll show you the interface, and then you get to decide in the comments.

On the business side, the phone is a bit different from the two other phones in that it targets a younger audience – also reflected in the price: Free, and with a 15 pounds/month contract, which includes data traffic.

On the interface side, note how the interface, mainly the buttons, on the screen tries to look like the actual buttons on the hardware. Once bought in to, it’s hard imagining why you would want to design an operating system that is separated from its immediate hardware. With this principle in mind, a black case makes a black background. Unlit pixels are good for many things – among them saving battery, demonstrating the OLED crispness – and, as mentioned, integrating with the black hardware.

Anyway, here we go:

When I first saw the homescreen on the 360 phone …

Read the rest of this entry »

Someone please build this: Anti-shelving filter for GMail

March 14th, 2010

So you’ve done all your GTD karate today. Hundreds of mails out of the way. The balls are at their court, just waiting for their follow-up. Because they do follow up right? What if they don’t, how do you catch them, then?

One of the biggest problems of getting things done is other people. And that’s not going to change.

The people I’ve talked to all have different ways of doing this. They all work. But they’re also wrong.

  • In Entourage or Outlook, adding a task with a deadline to the email before sending it.
  • BCC’ing oneself and letting that copy stay in the inbox until a reply comes in
  • Simply trusting that the other part will reply (…)
  • Various real-life actions such as phone calls and colleagues
  • Moving the mail into a”for follow up” folder
  • Adding the follow-up to one’s own todo lists

The last one underlines what’s wrong with the rest. It’s adding to my load what should be in yours. The ball is in neither court, floating somewhere over the net, and the person with the most incentive will follow up. If they remember.

Enter the marketplace

The GMail extension mocked up above would be a good way to make it okay that the ball floats over the net. Even simpler could also do just fine. The only real problem with it is that it’s not real yet. I’m hoping the rise of the Google Apps Marketplace will join GMail labs in improving email in small ways like this.

Or maybe I should integrate it into my half-done, half-abandoned calendar project?

UPDATE: What do you know, an almost exact version of this appears in the Etacts browser extension. I installed it and it actually appears. To things though: How do I get the actual reminder, other than going to Etacts? I’d love for this feature to be available without having to breach my entire email database to a third party. Anyway, thumbs up.

UPDATE II: An interesting comment thread over at the Consumerist blog is unfolding. Please note that the “re-send” option in the mockup is not really the point of this idea. In fact, I agree, it’s a pretty terrible addition.

New iPad ad showcasing compressed Danish music

March 8th, 2010

It’s a well known fact that TV ads, and even tracks when played on the radio all run through audio processing, such as a compressor, to make the sound more lively and in-your-face.

Here’s an example from the latest iPad ad

Is it just me or is the ad version slightly more interesting?

The Blue Van’s albums are available on Spotify.

80 years and 28 iterations of the Popular Science cover logo

March 5th, 2010

Google scanned all previous issues of Popular Science from 1929 to 2009. Irresistible if you’re a tech geek, yes, and maybe just as interesting if you’re into typography.

Apart from carrying the best illustrations of their times, the magazine’s logo development is a showcase of the shifting trends in typography and graphic design.

And, as we’ll see here, even typography history repeats itself. It’s worth noting how the magazine is striving to preserve hints and styles over the years.

1929

The indented “Science” version would in a later iteration become the most non-perishable form. It returns in 1963 and survives – in various versions – on the cover until 1995.

1925.png

Read the rest of this entry »


Home